Cases 11 - 20 of 5,067
Rodriguez v. Wexford Medical Department et al
as 2:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Mario Rodriguez
Defendant:
Wexford Medical Department, Alisha Tafoya, Cary Maciel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. State of New Mexico
as 2:2024cv00566
Petitioner:
Michael A Lopez
Respondent:
State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torres v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Christopher Torres
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faulkner v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 1:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Emil Faulkner
Defendant:
Michelle Lujan-Grisham, Alisha Tafoya, FNU Wilkens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 1:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Caleb Wright
Defendant:
Michelle Lujan-Grisham, Alisha Tafoya, FNU Wilkens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benavides v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 1:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
Eric Benavides
Defendant:
Michelle Lujan-Grisham, Alisha Tafoya, FNU Wilkens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanford v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Joe Blanford
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, GCCF, Jacob LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keraghan v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Robert Keraghan
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harlan v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lavone Harlan
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Probation and Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cosgray v. Eddy County Detention Center
as 2:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
David W. Cosgray
Defendant:
Eddy County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
