Cases 21 - 30 of 71
Thomas v. Thompson
as 5:2019cv03235
Respondent:
Patrick H. Thompson
Petitioner:
Darris Colton Thomas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moore v. Vokins et al
as 5:2019cv03226
Defendant:
Brenda Cameron, Robert Scott, Thomas Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Moore, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delaney (ID 72292) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2019cv03221
Defendant:
Danny R. Hornburger, Dylan H. Darter, Sam Cline and others
Plaintiff:
John K. Delaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Thompson et al
as 5:2019cv03045
Defendant:
Salina Regional Medical Center, Patrick H. Thompson and Salina Department of Children and Families
Plaintiff:
Robert Fitzsgerald Roberts, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson (ID 46091) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2018cv03280
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Petitioner:
Troy H. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clervrain v. Sessions et al
as 5:2018cv03039
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Jeff Sessions, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. Thompson et al
as 5:2018cv03028
Plaintiff:
Darris Colton Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Patrick H. Thompson, Christine Ladner and Teresa Lueth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Schoenhofer et al
as 5:2017cv03124
Plaintiff:
Troy H. Nelson
Defendant:
Mark T. Schoenhofer, Attorney General of Kansas, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Schoenhofer, et al.
as 5:2017cv03123
Plaintiff:
Troy H. Nelson
Defendant:
Attorney General of Kansas, John Doe, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. Kansas State University Medical Center Research Institute, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv03117
Plaintiff:
Jose Loreto Cruz
Defendant:
Kansas State University Medical Center Research Institute, Inc., Medtronic, Inc., Kansas University Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
