Cases 21 - 30 of 87
Musch v. Diggins
as 1:2022cv03328
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Musch
Defendant:
Elias Diggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chase v. Diggins et al
as 1:2022cv03321
Petitioner:
Christopher Chase
Respondent:
Elias Diggins and Dean Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ford v. Forde et al
as 1:2022cv02682
Plaintiff:
Brandon Maurice Ford
Defendant:
Brian Forde, Elias Diggins, Denver Sheriffs Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Diggins et al
as 1:2022cv00436
Petitioner:
Michael Joseph Roberts, Sr.
Respondent:
Elias Diggins and Denver Sheriff's Department, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dawkins v. Diggins et al
as 1:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Allen M. Dawkins
Defendant:
Elias Diggins, Lovato, Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Diggins et al
as 1:2022cv00053
Petitioner:
Michael Joseph Roberts
Respondent:
Elias Diggins and Denver Sheriff's Department, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barbour v. Polis et al
as 1:2021cv02747
Plaintiff:
Steve D Barbour and Steve D. Barbour
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Elias Diggins, Deputy Sheriff's Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnham v. Gimbill et al
as 1:2021cv02316
Plaintiff:
Arthur Burnham
Defendant:
Gimbill, State of Colorado and Diggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haff v. Diggins et al
as 1:2021cv01846
Petitioner:
Stephen August Haff
Respondent:
Elias Diggins and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Knox v. Diggins
as 1:2021cv01864
Plaintiff:
Samuel Andre Knox
Defendant:
Elias Diggins, Phil Weiser and Denver District Court Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
