Cases 21 - 30 of 464
May v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2023cv03151
Petitioner:
Shane Allen May
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker (ID 128454) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2023cv03153
Plaintiff:
Vincent Lee Walker
Defendant:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguilar (ID 129288) v. Smith et al
as 5:2023cv03135
Plaintiff:
Raymundo I. Aguilar
Defendant:
Mark Smith, Shannon Wilson, Moriah Plowden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amman Reu-El (ID 55931) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2023cv03139
Plaintiff:
King Phillip Amman Reu-El and Phillip Delbert Cheatham, Jr.
Defendant:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker (ID 128454) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2023cv03148
Plaintiff:
Vincent Lee Walker
Defendant:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neill v. Maag et al
as 5:2023cv03126
Plaintiff:
Chase Neill
Defendant:
Jared Maag, Skipper Jacobs, Stephen Hunting and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Woods (ID 77647) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2023cv03122
Plaintiff:
Kishen Woods
Defendant:
Kansas, State of and (fnu) Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wren v. (fnu) (lnu)
as 5:2023cv03091
Plaintiff:
Shannon D. Wren
Defendant:
Kansas, State of and (fnu) (lnu)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkins v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2023cv03099
Plaintiff:
James Nicholas Atkins
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Kansas Department of Corrections, American Civil Liberties Union and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods (ID 77647) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2023cv03121
Petitioner:
Kishen Woods, Sr.
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
