Cases 31 - 40 of 257
Delycia v. Zavares et al
as 1:2010cv01560
Petitioner:
Michal F. Delycia
Respondent:
Ari Zavares, Colorado, State of and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. Ploughe et al
as 1:2010cv01340
Petitioner:
Timothy P. Morris
Respondent:
Pamela Ploughe and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Forbes v. Milyard et al
as 1:2010cv01305
Petitioner:
Craig Dewayne Forbes
Respondent:
Kevin Milyard and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watson v. Ploughe et al
as 1:2010cv01287
Petitioner:
Daniel G. Watson
Respondent:
Pamela Ploughe and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maske, vs. City Attorney of Aurora, et al
as 1:2010cv00615
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Maske
Respondent:
City Attorney of Aurora and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maske, vs. Chappell, et al
as 1:2010cv00618
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Maske
Respondent:
Mary Chappell and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maske, vs. Estrada, et al
as 1:2010cv00617
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Maske
Respondent:
Valerie Estrada and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maske, vs. Estrada, et al
as 1:2010cv00619
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Maske
Respondent:
Valerie Estrada and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maske, vs. Murphy, et al
as 1:2010cv00616
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Maske
Respondent:
Robert Murphy and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2009cv02421
Petitioner:
Raymond Martinez
Respondent:
Aristedes Zavaras and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
