Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Baker v. Wollf et al
as 5:2013cv03120
Plaintiff:
John T. Baker
Defendant:
Kendra Wollf, Alisha Manford, (fnu) Evan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Evans et al
as 5:2013cv03035
Plaintiff:
Pierre Watson
Defendant:
Josh Evans, Lisa Hollingsworth, Richard W. Schott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Moore (ID 78654) v. Summer et al
as 5:2012cv03204
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Moore, Sr
Defendant:
Ryan Summer, Lenexa Police Department, Evan Camerio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv03202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Evans (ID 67355) v. LNU (1) et al
as 5:2012cv03192
Plaintiff:
Delarick Evans
Defendant:
FNU LNU (1) and FNU LNU (2)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans (ID 67355) v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv03181
Plaintiff:
Delarick Evans
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, (fnu) (lnu) and M. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv03174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Evans v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2012cv03144
Plaintiff:
Clyde Dale Evans, Sr.
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, United States of America, J. Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Evans (ID 67355) v. McKune et al
as 5:2012cv03103
Petitioner:
Delarick Evans
Respondent:
David R. McKune, Kansas Attorney General and Appellate Courts of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2012cv03091
Plaintiff:
Pierre Terron-Oneal Watson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Josh Evans, Lisa Hollingsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
