Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Goodloe v. United States Parole Comm., et al
as 09-1017
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY GOODLOE
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and GARY K. WATKINS
York v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 09-3008
Petitioner - Appellant:
PERRY YORK
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Gabriel v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 08-1438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN PETER GABRIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Gabriel v. United States Parole Commission
as 1:2008cv01495
Plaintiff:
Julian Peter Gabriel
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Boling-Bey v. U.S. Parole Commission, et al
as 08-3166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLIVER BOLING-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, PAMELA A. POSCH, Attorney, in her individual and official capacity, JEFFERY KOASTBAR, Examiner, in his individual and official capacity and others
David Cota v. United States Parole Commissio
as 08-1020
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID SALVADOR COTA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Munn v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 5:2007cv01442
Petitioner:
John Warren Munn
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and H A Ledezma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hernandez v. Davis et al
as 1:2007cv02406
Petitioner:
Jesus John Hernandez
Respondent:
Blake Davis and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cota v. United States Parole Commission
as 1:2007cv00851
Petitioner:
David Salvador Cota
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Boling v. Mundt, et al
as 07-3109
Petitioner - Appellant:
OLIVER M. BOLING
Respondent - Appellee:
R. MUNDT, Warden, USP-Leavenworth and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
