Cases 31 - 40 of 267
Clemmons v. United States District Court Western District of Michigan
as 1:2022cv01094
Petitioner:
Tirrell L. Clemmons
Respondent:
United States District Court Western District of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Crump v. USA
as 1:2021cv03461
Plaintiff:
Norvell Webster Crump
Defendant:
USA and United States District Court of Southern District of West Virginia at Huntington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Fly et al v. Carter et al
as 1:2021cv02815
Plaintiff:
Toni Fly and Joshua Stevens
Defendant:
C. Carter, Jones, Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. True et al
as 1:2021cv02765
Petitioner:
Prince Jones
Respondent:
B. True, United States Attorney General, Attorney General for the District of Columbia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Hunnicutt v. People of the United States of America, The
as 1:2021cv02365
Petitioner:
Jerald Hunnicutt
Respondent:
People of the United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richardson v. Blevins et al
as 1:2021cv02285
Plaintiff:
Dale J. Richardson
Defendant:
Blevins, Jones, Immigration Control and Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Blevins et al
as 1:2021cv02208
Plaintiff:
Dale J. Richardson
Defendant:
Blevins, Jones, Immigration Control and Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
