Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Williams v. Fox
as 5:2013cv01280
Petitioner:
James Lee Williams, II
Respondent:
John B Fox, Charles E Samuels, Jr, J A Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Norwood v. United States of America
as 5:2013cv01250
Movant:
Samuel Earl Norwood
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Spigelman v. Samuels et al
as 5:2013cv01138
Plaintiff:
Joel S Spigelman
Defendant:
Charles E Samuels, Jr, Paul A Kastner and Gooden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunn v. Samuels
as 5:2013cv00660
Petitioner:
Tyron Nunn
Respondent:
Charles E Samuels, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Banks v. Warden of the Federal Transfer Center et al
as 5:2013cv00193
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Warden of the Federal Transfer Center, Pam Butler, Drew Scarsborough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jefferies v. United States of America
as 5:2012cv01050
Movant:
Samuel Durant Jefferies
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Gonzales v. Adams et al
as 5:2011cv00661
Plaintiff:
Samuel Anthony Gonzales
Defendant:
Larry Adams and Eric Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett et al v. Moore
as 6:2011cv00074
Petitioner:
Roger Barnett , Bill Fife and Samuel Alexander
Respondent:
Patrick Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Folks v. Mullin
as 4:2009cv00786
Petitioner:
Samuel Clifton Folks, II
Respondent:
Mike Mullin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gramble v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2009cv00604
Plaintiff:
Samuel Elijah Gramble
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FNU Gessler, FNU Barby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
