Cases 41 - 50 of 119
Key v. Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado et al
as 1:2017cv01709
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen Key
Defendant:
Pitkin County Board of Commissioners , Joe DiSalvo , Roger Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Firman et al
as 1:2017cv01364
Plaintiff:
Shawn William Scott
Defendant:
Patrick Firman, Crum and Carol Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charette v. Executive Director, Colo. Dep't of Corr.
as 1:2017cv00214
Petitioner:
Roger J. Charette
Respondent:
Executive Director, Colo. Dep't of Corr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gooch v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al.
as 1:2016cv03146
Plaintiff:
William A. Gooch
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, John Chapdelaine, Laurie Tayofu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. OMaily et al.
as 1:2016cv03121
Plaintiff:
Sirrlove R. Williams
Defendant:
OMaily, White, Carole Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Mercer et al
as 1:2016cv02773
Plaintiff:
Allen Williams
Defendant:
Ricky Mercer, Roy Havens, Jodi Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. DeCesaro et al
as 1:2016cv02733
Plaintiff:
Bionca Charmaine Rogers
Defendant:
A. Anthony DeCesaro, Michelle Brothers, Terry Jaques and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Himes v. Colorado Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv01315
Plaintiff:
Eddie Himes
Defendant:
Colorado Dept. of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Roger Werholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkerson v. Colorado Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv01102
Defendant:
Colorado Dept of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Roger Werholtz and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Atkerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lujan v. Colorado Dept. Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv01105
Plaintiff:
Felix D. Lujan
Defendant:
Colorado Dept. Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Roger Werholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
