Cases 81 - 90 of 248
Morris v. Carlson et al
as 1:2015cv02349
Petitioner:
Michael A. Morris
Respondent:
Mary Carlson and Angel Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vigil v. Central Classification Committee et al
as 1:2015cv02111
Plaintiff:
Frank Vigil, Jr
Defendant:
Central Classification Committee, Angel Medina and Rick Raemisch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frye v. Medina et al
as 1:2015cv01944
Petitioner:
Gregory Paul Frye
Respondent:
Angel Medina and Cynthia Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aranda v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2015cv01629
Plaintiff:
Derrick Aranda
Defendant:
Rick Raemish, Larry Turner, Angel Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petrie v. Colorado Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01467
Plaintiff:
Michael Petrie
Defendant:
Colorado Dept. of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Travis Trani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. Archuleta
as 1:2015cv01334
Petitioner:
Joseph Medina
Respondent:
Lou Archuleta and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina v. Colorado Department of Corrections, The et al
as 1:2015cv00712
Petitioner:
Nick R. Medina
Respondent:
Colorado Department of Corrections, The, Rick Raemisch and Faulk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Medina v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2015cv00200
Petitioner:
Hilario Medina
Respondent:
State of Utah and Alfred Bigelow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dawson v. Brightwell, et al
as 15-1103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES RALPH DAWSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD BRIGHTWELL, PAUL AUDET and ANGEL MEDINA
Defendant:
SUSAN AUDET, a/k/a Deanne Audet, DINO WILLIAMS, STEVEN OWENS and others
Longoria v. Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) et al
as 1:2015cv00302
Plaintiff:
Ysidro Longoria
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , Lucero , Lucero (I) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
