Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Parker et al v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Felisha Parker and Laresha Parker
Defendant:
Lawton City of, James T Smith, Terry Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lee Kelley, George Isbill, Rocky Ward and others
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. Staples
as 4:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Watkins, III
Defendant:
Joshua Bradley Staples
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Bridges
as 4:2023cv00186
Petitioner:
Daniel Cody Watkins
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Lawton City of, James Smith, Terry Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00681
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Watkins v. Nunn
as 4:2021cv00463
Petitioner:
Daniel Cody Watkins
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watkins v. Denver County Detention Center
as 1:2021cv02858
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lamont Watkins
Defendant:
Denver County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horner et al v. United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2021cv00105
Defendant:
L Howard, CO Watkins, Lt. LaSalle and others
Plaintiff:
John R Horner and Billy Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. English et al
as 5:2020cv03190
Defendant:
W. J. Morris, Earl Leroy Yeakel, III, Craig Watkins and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Marshall, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
