Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Maestas v. Roybal et al
as 1:2023cv01140
Petitioner:
Alfonso Maestas
Respondent:
Joseph J. Roybal and Stacie Kwitek-Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maestas v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2023cv00892
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Maestas
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maestas v. Ahrens
as 1:2023cv00664
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Maestas
Defendant:
Adam Michaels Ahrens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maestas v. Dejeane
as 1:2023cv00644
Plaintiff:
Maestas and Alfonso Maestas
Defendant:
Robert Dejeane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maestas v. House of Prayer Holy Reformation Church
as 1:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Maestas
Defendant:
House of Prayer Holy Reformation Church
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salazar-Velasquez v. Hudson et al
as 5:2022cv03287
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Alfonso Salazar-Velasquez
Defendant:
D. Hudson, (fnu) Armijo, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kinnard (ID 83386) v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv03148
Plaintiff:
Alfonso R. Kinnard
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, (fnu) Beardsley, (fnu) Towers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navarrete v. USA
as 1:2020cv00570
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alfonso Navarrete
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Betancourt Barco et al v. Price et al
as 2:2020cv00350
Defendant:
Chad Wolf, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew T. Albence and others
Plaintiff:
Rando Betancourt Barco, Michel Fuentes Luis and Luis Alfonso Mejia Velasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Leon v. Mason et al
as 1:2019cv02046
Defendant:
No Named Defendants, Grant Mason, Leanne Hopper and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Alfonso Leon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
