Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rose v. Elliott et al
as 5:2019cv00641
Plaintiff:
Victor V Rose
Defendant:
Daniel B Pond and Charles Ray Elliott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Ray et al
as 6:2009cv00176
Plaintiff:
Calvin Eugene Barnett
Defendant:
Charles Ray, Robert Ezell, Bill Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodner v. Parker
as 5:2008cv01095
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Goodner
Respondent:
David Parker
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barnett v. Ray et al
as 6:2008cv00157
Plaintiff:
Calvin Eugene Barnett
Defendant:
Charles Ray, Robert Ezell, Bill Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Burghart v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2008cv00062
Plaintiff:
Bobby Burghart
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Cimarron Correctional Facility, Charles Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford v. Ray et al
as 6:2007cv00416
Petitioner:
Harvey D. Bradford
Respondent:
Charles Ray and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Troutt v. Jones et al
as 5:2007cv01062
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Troutt
Respondent:
Justin Jones, John Doe, Charles Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fairchilds v. Ray et al
as 4:2007cv00337
Petitioner:
Earnest Dale Fairchilds
Respondent:
Charles Ray and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Ray et al
as 5:2007cv00316
Petitioner:
Roberto Antonio Jackson
Respondent:
Charles Ray, Charles Ray and Drew Edmondson
Defendant:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. Scott et al
as 6:2007cv00059
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Watkins
Defendant:
Wade Scott, Robert Ezell, Sada Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
