Cases 1 - 10 of 3,755
Ricks (PS) v. Polis et al
as 1:2024cv02565
Defendant:
Elias Diggins, Mike Johnson, Jared Polis and others
Plaintiff:
John Allen Ricks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chenoweth (PS) v. Lankford
as 1:2024cv02556
Plaintiff:
Anthony John Chenoweth
Defendant:
Lankford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dollinger (PS) v. Moreno et al
as 1:2024cv02480
Defendant:
John Moreno, Daniel Montoya, Jeff Long and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Dollinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2024cv03154
Defendant:
Seth Osborn, Progress Review Panel, Kansas, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Ryan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Decker v. Chickasha City Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00905
Defendant:
District Attorneys Office, Chickasha City Police Department and Unknown Officers
Plaintiff:
Isaac John Earl Decker, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis (PS) v. Buchanan et al
as 1:2024cv02316
Defendant:
John Buchanan and David Hinners
Plaintiff:
Lamar Delray Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis (PS) v. US Deputy Sheriffs Association et al
as 1:2024cv02292
Defendant:
US Deputy Sheriffs Association, David Hinners and John B. Buchanan
Plaintiff:
Lamar Delray Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soto v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00774
Defendant:
Administrator John Doe
Plaintiff:
Narcizo Soto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cordova v. Doe
as 1:2024cv02139
Respondent:
John Doe
Petitioner:
Louis M. Cordova
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Purdy v. Carter et al
as 5:2024cv00755
Defendant:
Jackson County Jail and FNU Carter
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Purdy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
