Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Cordova v. Kautz et al
as 1:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Cordova
Defendant:
Trisha Kautz, T. J. Rittenhouse, Vickie Nira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sargent v. Pueblo County Sheriff Office Dentention Center et al
as 1:2020cv02732
Defendant:
Tara Wagner, Tara (I) Wagner, Justin Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Sargent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Xiong v. McCormick et al
as 5:2020cv00726
Defendant:
William McCormick, Jennifer Turnage, Nicholas Gamble and others
Plaintiff:
Pao Xiong and Pao Hue Yeng Xiong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2020cv00350
Defendant:
Anna Estevez, John Smithee, United States Postal Service and others
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Tivis v. Reamish et al
as 1:2020cv00372
Defendant:
R. McCormick, Jason Gudry, Dean Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Tivis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormick v. Medical Dept. DOC Freemont Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Brad A. McCormick
Defendant:
Medical Dept. DOC Freemont Correctional Facility, Susan Epps, Daniel Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Xiong v. McCormick et al
as 5:2017cv00872
Petitioner:
Pao Xiong
Respondent:
William McCormick, FNU Lepird and Keri Avant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Xiong v. McCormick et al
as 5:2017cv00873
Plaintiff:
Pao Xiong
Defendant:
William McCormick, Nichols Gamble, Katie Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Xiong v. McCormick et al
as 5:2017cv00875
Petitioner:
Pao Xiong
Respondent:
William McCormick and Jennifer Turnage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
