Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Seals v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00506
Petitioner: Michael Dwayne Seals and Michael Dwayne Washington
Respondent: United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gottorff (PS) v. Michelich
as 1:2023cv02384
Plaintiff: David J Gottorff
Defendant: Andres Michelich, Brian Hoefling, Shane Schmalz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gottorff (PS) v. Seal
as 1:2023cv02388
Plaintiff: David J Gottorff
Defendant: Josh Seal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seals v. Rankins We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00737
Petitioner: Curtis Bernard Seals
Respondent: Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Seals v. Rudd
as 1:2023cv00836
Plaintiff: Edward Seals
Defendant: N. Rudd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seals v. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2023cv00620
Plaintiff: Edward Seals
Defendant: Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seals v. FBOP
as 1:2022cv02186
Plaintiff: Edward Seals
Defendant: FBOP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seals v. Crow We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00315
Petitioner: Curtis Bernard Seals
Respondent: Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Seals v. Weise
as 1:2022cv00080
Plaintiff: Edward Seals
Defendant: C. Weise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seals v. Crow We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00535
Respondent: Scott Crow
Petitioner: Curtis Bernard Seals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?