Cases 1 - 10 of 1,143
Gormley v. Stancil, et al
as 24-1270
Petitioner:
KATHLEEN GORMLEY
Respondent:
ANDRE STANCIL and PHIL WEISER, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Victorino v. Jacques, et al
as 24-1272
Petitioner:
ANGEL D. VICTORINO
Respondent:
TERRY JACQUES, L.C.F. Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Hackborn v. Parsons, et al
as 24-1264
Petitioner:
DEAN D. HACKBORN
Respondent:
WARDEN PARSONS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Johnson v. Stancil, et al
as 24-1180
Petitioner:
DERRICK JOHNSON
Respondent:
ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, JENNIFER HANSEN, Warden Colorado Territorial Correction Facility and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Sears v. Long, et al
as 24-1256
Petitioner:
CRISTINA W. SEARS
Respondent:
RYAN LONG, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Hale-El (PS) v. Florres
as 1:2024cv01017
Petitioner:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Respondent:
Ryan Florres, Jaquez and Attorney General for the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cordova (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01590
Petitioner:
Louis M. Cordova
Respondent:
Diggins and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simkins v. Fairbairn, et al
as 24-1140
Plaintiff:
WILLIE J. SIMKINS
Respondent:
MARK FAIRBAIRN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Farrow v. People of the State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1239
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FARROW
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF CDOC and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Scaife v. Jacques, et al
as 24-1240
Petitioner:
VERYL B. SCAIFE
Respondent:
TERRY JACQUES, Warden, ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director, CDOC and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
