Cases 1 - 10 of 905
Harlan v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lavone Harlan
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Probation and Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. Johnson County Board of Commissioners et al
as 5:2024cv03082
Plaintiff:
Steven Crump
Defendant:
Johnson County Board of Commissioners, (fnu) (lnu), Nathaniel (lnu) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
Matthew Baker
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico State Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoyt v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoyt
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. Clemens et al
as 5:2024cv03076
Plaintiff:
Steven Crump
Defendant:
Sheila Clemens, (fnu) (lnu) (1), (fnu) Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. New Mexico Parole Board
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Robert Barrett
Defendant:
New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chino v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Earl Chino
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico State Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lujan v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lujan
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Probation and Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lynn Manning
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Dominic Sanchez
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
