Labor Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 682
Lucero v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023cv02495
Plaintiff: Cynthia D Lucero and Cindy Lucero
Defendant: DPI Specialty Foods, Inc. a corporation, as the designated Plan Administrator, referred to herein as Dpi doing business as Dpi Specialty Foods doing business as DPI Specialty Foods Rocky Mountain, Inc., a Colorado corporation, which is also a control, Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company referred to in this action sometimes as Hartford doing business as The Hartford, DPI Specialty Foods Employee Welfare Benefits Plan, The and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Armia et al v. RJCL Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00013
Plaintiff: Prospero A. Armia, Nemencio Q. Deleon, Giovan Malazarte and others
Defendant: RJCL Corporation doing business as RNV Construction, Homesmart Corporation doing business as Best Deal General Merchandise, Paragon Corporation doing business as Coreplus Construction and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chapman v. Lowen Corporation
as 2:2023cv02396
Plaintiff: Charles Chapman
Defendant: Lowen Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Zhao v. Success International Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00012
Plaintiff: Luzhou Zhao
Defendant: Success International Corporation doing business as Success Auto Repair Shop and Guojun Miao
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Su v. Ascent Construction, et al
as 23-4114
Plaintiff / Appellee: JULIE A. SU, Acting Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant / Appellant: ASCENT CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Utah corporation, BRADLEY L. KNOWLTON and ASCENT CONSTRUCTION, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN, an employee benefit plan
M., et al v. Beacon Health Options, et al
as 23-4112
Plaintiff / Appellee: THEO M. and M. M.
Defendant / Appellant: BEACON HEALTH OPTIONS, INC. and CHEVRON CORPORATION MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE PLAN
T. et al v. Sumitomo Mitsui Banking et al
as 4:2023cv00055
Plaintiff: Massimo T., Karin D. and S. T.
Defendant: Sumitomo Mitsui Banking and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Welfare Benefit Plan, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Sadle v. Columbine Logging, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01495
Plaintiff: Sharon Sadle
Defendant: Columbine Logging, Inc. doing business as Columbine Corporation
Lomax v. Starbucks Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01426
Petitioner: Matthew S. Lomax
Respondent: Starbucks Corporation
Amicus Curiae: Workers United
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Myers v. Papa Texas, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00429
Plaintiff: Luke Myers
Defendant: Papa Texas, LLC, Guillermo Perales, Doe Corporation 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?