Cases 91 - 100 of 138
High Country Citizens' Alliance et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 1:2013cv01723
Plaintiff:
High Country Citizens' Alliance , WildEarth Guardians and Sierra Club
Defendant:
United States Forest Service , Bureau of Land Management , Daniel Jiron and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Ark Land Company and Mountain Coal Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
NM Off-Hwy Vehicle Alliance, et al v. U.S. Forest Service, et al
as 13-2116
Petitioner - Appellee:
THE NEW MEXICO OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE ALLIANCE, a New Mexico nonprofit corporation
Respondent:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, THOMAS TIDWELL, in his official capacity as Chief of the United States Forest Service, MARIA T. GARCIA, in her official capacity as Santa Fe National Forest Supervisor and others
Movant - Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and SIERRA CLUB
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS et al v. U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
as 2:2013cv00042
Plaintiff:
WildEarth Guardians and Sierra Club
Defendant:
U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Intervenor_defendant:
State of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 (2) Administrative Procedures Act
Heal Utah, et al v. EPA, et al
as 13-9510
Petitioner:
HEAL UTAH, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, POWDER RIVER BASIN RESOURCE COUNCIL and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and LISA P. JACKSON, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Heal Utah, et al v. EPA, et al
as 13-9509
Petitioner:
HEAL UTAH, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, POWDER RIVER BASIN RESOURCE COUNCIL and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and LISA JACKSON, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Heal Utah, et al v. EPA, et al
as 13-9508
Petitioner:
HEAL UTAH, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, POWDER RIVER BASIN RESOURCE COUNCIL and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and LISA JACKSON, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Heal Utah, et al v. EPA, et al
as 13-9507
Petitioner:
HEAL UTAH, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, POWDER RIVER BASIN RESOURCE COUNCIL and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and LISA JACKSON, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al
as 2:2013cv00047
Plaintiff:
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance , Natural Resources Defense Council , Wilderness Society and others
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Land Management, United States Department of the Interior and Juan Palma
Movant:
Gasco Energy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Colorado Environmental, et al v. Salazar, et al
as 12-1339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLORADO ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION, COLORADO MOUNTAIN CLUB, COLORADO TROUT UNLIMITED and others
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS
Defendant:
KENNETH SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Interior, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, SALLY WISELY, in her official capacity as Colorado State Director of the Bureau of Land Management and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
BILL BARRETT CORPORATION
Intervenor:
OXY USA, INC., WPX ENERGY ROCKY MOUNTAIN, LLC and ANTERO RESOURCES PICEANCE CORPORATION
Colorado Environmental, et al v. Salazar, et al
as 12-1322
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COLORADO ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION, COLORADO MOUNTAIN CLUB, COLORADO TROUT UNLIMITED and others
Defendant:
KENNETH SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Interior, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, SALLY WISELY, in her official capacity as Colorado State Director of the Bureau of Land Management and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
BILL BARRETT CORPORATION
Intervenor:
OXY USA, INC, WPX ENERGY ROCKY MOUNTAIN, LLC and ANTERO RESOURCES PICEANCE CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
