Cases 101 - 110 of 25,627
Smith v. City of North Branch
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Eric Smith
Defendant:
City of North Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
S. v. Humana Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
R. S.
Defendant:
Humana Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Palmer v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Layna Palmer
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
CAO Group Inc v. Walmart Inc.
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
CAO Group Inc
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Rohbock v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Mickey Rohbock
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
Trim Art, LLC v. Baca Systems, LLC
as 2:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Trim Art, LLC
Defendant:
Baca Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals et al v. Vintage Muscle
as 2:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals and Intellectual Wellness
Defendant:
Vintage Muscle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Scott v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Edward Scott
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Thomas v. Shields et al
as 2:2024mc00181
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey A Thomas
Defendant:
Jeffery Shields and Terel T Shields
Robertson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Jerolyn Chapple Robertson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
