Cases 141 - 150 of 500
Irons v. Dauffenbauch et al
as 1:2018cv01726
Petitioner:
David W. Irons
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Colorado, The and Scott Dauffenbauch
Defendant:
Angel Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2018cv01298
Plaintiff:
Terry Schramek, Shaun Lackovic, J. B. and others
Defendant:
National Foam Inc., Kidde Fire Fighting, Inc, The 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Padilla et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2018cv01199
Plaintiff:
Ronell Massie, Tamara McCullough, Bernard Balck and others
Defendant:
Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., Buckeye Fire Equipment Co., National Foam Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Muhammad v. Core Civic Inc et al
as 1:2018cv00772
Plaintiff:
Haki Muhammad
Defendant:
Core Civic Inc , Bickle and Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00255
Plaintiff:
Jacob E. Nichols
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., J. Bowen, Donald Vigil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv00148
Plaintiff:
Hilario Medina
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Rollin Cook and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. Leatham et al
as 2:2018cv00108
Plaintiff:
Hilario Medina
Defendant:
Robin Leatham, Logan Clark and FNU Halladay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aurit v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2018cv00057
Plaintiff:
Todd Anthony Aurit
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Colorado Department of Corrections, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gess v. Medina et al.
as 1:2017cv03061
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gess
Defendant:
Angel Medina, Arlin R Peterson, ST. Mary Corwin Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. Colvin
as 1:2017cv02999
Plaintiff:
Jessica Medina
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
