Cases 11 - 20 of 57
AVT California v. Arrow Recycling Solutions et al
as 2:2019cv00939
Defendant:
KTK, A Plus Businesses, Patricia Kunnel and others
Plaintiff:
AVT California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buckeye Polymers, Inc. et al v. Bunting Magnetics Co.
as 6:2019cv01251
Plaintiff:
BPI Recycling, LLC and Buckeye Polymers, Inc.
Defendant:
Bunting Magnetics Co.
Interested Party:
Varilease Finance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AgriFeeds Technologies v. NRP of Indiana et al
as 2:2018cv00974
Plaintiff:
AgriFeeds Technologies
Defendant:
Naturally Recycled Proteins, NRP of Indiana and NRP of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00902
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc. et al v. A and A Quality Appliance, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02923
Plaintiff:
Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc. and ApplianceSmart, Inc.
Defendant:
A and A Quality Appliance, Inc. and Charles E. Ewing
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Graham v. CHEP Recycled Pallet Solutions
as 2:2017cv01250
Plaintiff:
Kenneth G. Graham
Defendant:
CHEP Recycled Pallet Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Century Recyclers Inc. v. Nelson
as 2:2017cv02575
Plaintiff:
Century Recyclers Inc.
Defendant:
Brent E. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rocky Mountain Recycling, LLC v. Hi-Tec Plastics, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01520
Plaintiff:
Rocky Mountain Recycling, LLC
Defendant:
Hi-Tec Plastics, Inc. , Louis Hard and Louis (I) Hard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
