Cases 11 - 20 of 6,570
Farrow v. People of the State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1239
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FARROW
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF CDOC and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Scaife v. Jacques, et al
as 24-1240
Petitioner:
VERYL B. SCAIFE
Respondent:
TERRY JACQUES, Warden, ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director, CDOC and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Hill v. Rankins et al
as 5:2024cv00564
Petitioner:
Patrick Henry Hill, II
Respondent:
William C Rankins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salas v. Horton, et al
as 24-2084
Petitioner:
PAUL STEPHEN SALAS
Respondent:
VINCENT HORTON, Warden and HECTOR BALDERAS, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Lopez-Vega v. Garland
as 24-9537
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL LOPEZ-VEGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Firkins (PS) v. Burtlow et al
as 1:2024cv01531
Petitioner:
Andrew J. Firkins
Respondent:
Siobhan Burtlow and Attorney General for the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Wyoming Attorney General, et al
as 24-8038
Petitioner:
SEAN ROGERS
Respondent:
WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF WYOMING and WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE PENITENTIARY WARDEN, in her official capacity, AKA Neicole Molden
Adams v. Wyoming Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-8039
Petitioner:
JETT GARRIOTT ADAMS
Respondent:
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Castillo v. Attorney General State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2024cv00523
Petitioner:
Derrick J. Castillo
Respondent:
Attorney General State of New Mexico and Flora Gallegos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Vreeland
as 24-1234
Petitioner:
DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Respondent:
DAVID ZUPAN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
