Cases 11 - 20 of 5,539
Cordova (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01590
Petitioner:
Louis M. Cordova
Respondent:
Diggins and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simkins v. Fairbairn, et al
as 24-1140
Plaintiff:
WILLIE J. SIMKINS
Respondent:
MARK FAIRBAIRN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Ricks, et al v. Polis, et al
as 24-1148
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALLEN RICKS and MOURAD KARIM MAES
Defendant:
JARED POLIS, Governor of the State of Colorado, PHILIP J. WEISER, Attorney General, JAY SUTHERLAND GRANT, Denver Disrict Court Judge and others
Maes, et al v. Polis, et al
as 24-1157
Plaintiff:
MOURAD KARIM MAES and JOHN ALLEN RICKS
Defendant:
JARED POLIS, Governor of the State of Colorado, PHILIP J. WEISER, Attorney General, JAY SUTHERLAND GRANT, Denver Disrict Court Judge and others
Farrow v. People of the State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1239
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FARROW
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF CDOC and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Scaife v. Jacques, et al
as 24-1240
Petitioner:
VERYL B. SCAIFE
Respondent:
TERRY JACQUES, Warden, ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director, CDOC and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Hill v. Rankins et al
as 5:2024cv00564
Petitioner:
Patrick Henry Hill, II
Respondent:
William C Rankins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salas v. Horton, et al
as 24-2084
Petitioner:
PAUL STEPHEN SALAS
Respondent:
VINCENT HORTON, Warden and HECTOR BALDERAS, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Arredondo v. Rios et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Petitioner:
Sergio Arredondo
Respondent:
H. Rios and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez-Vega v. Garland
as 24-9537
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL LOPEZ-VEGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
