Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Romero v. Nelson, et al
as 19-4175
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH, UTAH BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE and SHANE NELSON
Petitioner / Appellant:
RUDY M. ROMERO
Shields v. Smith et al.
as 5:2019cv00801
Respondent:
Scott Crow, Board of Pardon and Parole and RC Smith
Petitioner:
Mark Shields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sherratt v. Nelson et al
as 4:2019cv00002
Petitioner:
William Sherratt
Respondent:
Utah Board of Pardons and Parole, Utah Supreme Court and Shane Nelson
Undetermined:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Romero v. State of Utah et al
as 4:2018cv00003
Petitioner:
Rudy M. Romero
Respondent:
State of Utah, Shane Nelson and Utah Board of Pardons and Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Defoe v. Board of Pardons and Parole et al
as 2:2018cv00027
Petitioner:
David Arnold Defoe
Respondent:
Board of Pardons and Parole, Adult Probation and Parole and State of Utah, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Messineo v. Kemp et al
as 2:2017cv01225
Plaintiff:
Richard Messineo
Defendant:
Debbie Kemp, Utah Board of Pardons and Parole, Utah Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rydberg v. South Dakota Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 5:2016cv03242
Plaintiff:
Douglas A. Rydberg
Defendant:
South Dakota Board of Pardons and Paroles, Myron Rau and Ed Lightenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. DeMill et al
as 2:2016cv01085
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wade Jones
Defendant:
FNU DeMill, Gary Herbert, Scott Crowther and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butt v. State of Utah Board of Pardons and Parole
as 2:2016cv00827
Petitioner:
Eric Leon Butt, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Utah Board of Pardons and Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baker v. Utah Board of Pardons and Parole et al
as 2:2016cv00756
Defendant:
Utah Board of Pardons and Parole and Gary Herbert
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
