Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 65
Chan (PS) v. Roon
as 1:2023cv02498
Plaintiff: Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant: No Named Defendant, Attorney General State of Colorado, Chan Moi Roon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan (PS) v. Tatoya et al
as 1:2023cv02314
Petitioner: Nai Lyi Chan
Respondent: Mo Tatoya, Michael Dugo, Punjwanj and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
March et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 2:2023cv02360
Plaintiff: Richard March, Belinda Hollins, Elisa Chan and others
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chan v. Fischer et al
as 1:2023cv01412
Plaintiff: Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant: Fischer, Hackler and George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Prowers County District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2023cv01331
Plaintiff: Channing Curry
Defendant: People of the State of Colorado, Prowers County, Joshua Vogel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2023cv01200
Plaintiff: Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant: No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2023cv00950
Plaintiff: Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant: No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2023cv00916
Plaintiff: Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant: No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2023cv00877
Petitioner: Nai Lyi Chan
Respondent: No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chan v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2023cv00779
Plaintiff: Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant: No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?