Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Umoren v. Byrd, et al
as 16-6230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WILSON UMOREN
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN BYRD, Warden of prison, individually, FNU BRAGGS, Deputy Warden, individually, CHIEF HILLIGOSS, Chief of Management, individually and others
Davis v. Corrections Corporation, et al
as 16-6047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, CHAD MILLER, Warden, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MILLER and others
Umoren v. Byrd et al
as 5:2016cv00106
Plaintiff:
John Wilson Umoren
Defendant:
Warden Byrd, Braggs, Chief Hilligoss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Cox et al
as 5:2015cv00421
Plaintiff:
Adrian DesJuan Bishop
Defendant:
Larry Cox, FNU Braggs, FNU McBurney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hilligoss et al v. Sandlin et al
as 5:2015cv00284
Plaintiff:
Kieth Hilligoss and Cullas Webb
Defendant:
Phillip Sandlin and Rebecca Sandlin Reavis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McMiller v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2014cv00647
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Henry McMiller
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Chad Miller, FNU Middleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2013cv01174
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Chad Miller, Officer Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Miller et al
as 5:2013cv00784
Plaintiff:
Adrian DesJuan Bishop
Defendant:
Warden Miller, Green, FNU Wesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Sebenick, et al
as 13-6150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LAROY SIMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH SEBENICK, Investigator, M. CRANE, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, K. HALL, Disciplinary Investigator and others
Craft v. Null, et al
as 13-6089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS DOUGLAS CRAFT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER NULL, OFFICER ORR, Correctional Officer, OFFICER BOONE, Correctional Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
