Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Intelligent Designs 2000 Corp. v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00437
Plaintiff: Intelligent Designs 2000 Corp.
Defendant: Sears, Roebuck and Co., Sprint Nextel Corporation, Homer TLC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0101
United States of America v. Prehistoric Pottery Sherds Found At the Hamm Residence Including the Following et al
as 1:2011cv00055
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Prehistoric Pottery Sherds Found at the Hamm Residence Including the Following, Stone Axe, Photos and Negatives of Artifacts (Found in an envelope) and others
Claimant: Brian Palmer and Barry Beasley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
USA v. Leathers
as 1:2010cv01070
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Ronald R. Leathers
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Denmel Holdings et al v. Mizco International et al
as 2:2009cv01107
Plaintiff: Denmel Holdings, Denmel Holdings, Denmel Holdings and others
Defendant: Mizco International, Mark Feldstein, Modern Marketing Concepts and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Leathers v. Sunset Ridge Apartments et al
as 2:2009cv00100
Plaintiff: Lisa Leathers
Defendant: Sunset Ridge Apartments, Law Office of Kirk A. Cullimore and Kirk A. Cullimore
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Leathers v. Leathers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2008cv01213
Plaintiff: Michael R. Leathers
Defendant: Ronald Leathers, James Holden, Chesapeake Operating, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Joe Alfred Izen, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Leathers v. Jones
as 4:2007cv00644
Petitioner: Tasby Tyrone Leathers
Respondent: Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?