Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 3,444
Armajo v. State of Wyoming, et al
as 24-8040
Plaintiff: CHARLES ALFRED ARMAJO, JR.
Defendant: STATE OF WYOMING, WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SETH NORRIS, individually and as warden of Wyoming Medium Correctional Institution and others
Rogers v. Wyoming Attorney General, et al
as 24-8038
Petitioner: SEAN ROGERS
Respondent: WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF WYOMING and WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE PENITENTIARY WARDEN, in her official capacity, AKA Neicole Molden
Hess v. Quick
as 24-5064
Petitioner: DARYL A. HESS
Respondent: CHRISTE QUICK, Warden
In re: Vreeland
as 24-1234
Petitioner: DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Respondent: DAVID ZUPAN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Moore v. Hodge, et al
as 24-1230
Plaintiff: ARTHUR MOORE
Defendant: DR. HODGE, (CSP), MARSHALL GRIFFITH, (CSP) and WARDEN LITTLE
Luginbyhl v. Moore, et al
as 24-6102
Plaintiff: LEVI LUGINBYHL
Defendant: DARRELL L. MOORE, JUDGE PHILLIP C. CORLEY, CIMARRON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, AKA Core Civic and others
Gentilini v. State of Wyoming et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Defendant: Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff: David Alan Gentilini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Dunn
as 24-6098
Petitioner: In re: ROBERT DAVID DUNN
Respondent: CARRIE BRIDGES, Warden
Ogden v. Turner, et al
as 24-2079
Petitioner: KEVIN K. OGDEN
Respondent: NEIL TURNER, Warden, GUADALUPE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Davis v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00486
Petitioner: DeMaurea Davis
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?