Cases 11 - 20 of 171
GS Holistic, LLC v. Smokey Monkey 4 LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01846
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Smokey Monkey 4 LLC doing business as Smokey Monkey Drake and Nassim Kchik
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Varnell v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00245
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jerry Drake Varnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Drake v. Burtlow et al
as 1:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Adam J. Drake
Defendant:
Siobahn Burtlow, David Bergman, Casey Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. McGrath, et al
as 22-1447
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MERIDETH MCGRATH, MATTHEW WINDEN, HODGES and others
Johnson v. Brady, et al
as 22-1448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE JILL BRADY, JESSICA AGGSON, DAVID CHAPIN and others
Johnson v. Brady et al
as 1:2022cv03216
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Judge Jill Brady, Jessica Aggson, David Chapin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. State of Oklahoma DOC et al
as 4:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
Noel King, Sonny Moore, Reginald Anderson and others
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma DOC, Derrick Yazel, Jason Lemons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. McGrath et al
as 1:2022cv03042
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Defendant:
Merideth McGrath, Matthew Winden, Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. McGrath et al
as 1:2022cv03019
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Merideth McGrath, Matthew Winden, Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hansen v. United States
as 22-4102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY DRAKE HANSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
