Cases 21 - 30 of 228
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Franks v. Clayton
as 4:2022cv00328
Petitioner:
Avery Lloyd Franks
Respondent:
Deon Clayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaughn v. Crow
as 4:2022cv00281
Petitioner:
Frank Charles Vaughn, III
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Franks et al v. Apex Surgical LLC
as 5:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
Joel Franks and Tammy Franks
Defendant:
Apex Surgical LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Oklahoma State of et al v. Biden et al
as 5:2021cv01136
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma State of, J Kevin Stitt, John M O'Connor and others
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Jr, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Oklahoma State of et al v. Biden et al
as 5:2021cv01069
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma State of, Kevin J Stitt and John M OConnor
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Jr, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Bridges v. Crocker et al
as 5:2021cv01066
Plaintiff:
Howard Bridges, Jr
Defendant:
Vernon Crocker, Frank Thomas and Connor Frank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. United States of America
as 4:2021cv00260
Plaintiff:
Frank R Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
