Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Jones v. Cline et al
as 5:2010cv03034
Petitioner:
Brad Joseph Jones
Respondent:
Sam Cline and Stephen Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Atkinson v. Six
as 5:2010cv03017
Petitioner:
Shawn Atkinson
Respondent:
Stephen Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Werholtz et al
as 5:2010cv03006
Petitioner:
Billy Hill
Respondent:
Roger Werholtz and Stephen Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortega-Cadelan v. Goddard et al
as 5:2009cv03284
Petitioner:
Angelo Ortega-Cadelan
Respondent:
Johnnie Goddard and Stephen Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Cline et al
as 5:2009cv03279
Petitioner:
Andrew K. Thompson
Respondent:
Sam Cline and Stephen Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2009cv03261
Petitioner:
Harold E. Hawkins, Jr.
Respondent:
Kansas, State of, Sam Cline and Stephen Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myers v. Walters et al
as 5:2009cv03263
Plaintiff:
Jason E. Myers
Defendant:
(fnu) Walters, (fnu) Dyson, Frie Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopper v. Cline et al
as 5:2009cv03191
Petitioner:
William Hopper
Respondent:
Sam Cline and Stephen Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crum v. Roberts et al
as 5:2009cv03169
Petitioner:
Kim E. Crum
Respondent:
Ray Roberts and Stephen Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. McKune et al
as 5:2009cv03171
Petitioner:
Brad Lee Jones
Respondent:
David R. McKune and Stephen Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
