Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Veren v. U.S. Dept of Justice, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 14-1157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WARREN VEREN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, MARY HERNDON, Administrator, U.S. Marshal Service and others
Wilson v. U.S. Marshal Service
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2011cv00079
Petitioner:
Carl L. Wilson
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Reed v. Six, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 10-3334
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGER LEE REED
Respondent - Appellee:
STEPHEN SIX, Attorney General of the State of Kansas, BUREAU OF PRISONS, RONALD W. RIKER, Designation & Sentence Computation Center and others
Zani v. U.S. Marshals, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 09-4107
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT JOSEPH ZANI
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE, SALT LAKE CITY and TEXAS BOARD OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Zani v. U.S. Marshals Service, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 09-1110
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT JOSEPH ZANI
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE, Denver and TEXAS BOARD OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, Huntsville
Zani v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2009cv00052
Petitioner:
Robert Joseph Zani
Respondent:
U.S. Marshals Service and Texas Board of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.