Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Paris et al v. Medline Industries Inc et al
as 2:2014cv00119
Plaintiff:
Beverly Paris , Stanley Winters and Donna Winters
Defendant:
Medline Industries Inc, Team Tehcnologies Inc and Team Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Lubeck et al
as 2:2013cv00933
Plaintiff:
Dexter Paris Davis
Defendant:
Bruce Lubeck, Matthew J. Hansen, Matthew A. Barraza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Paris et al
as 6:2013cv01210
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daisy S. Paris and Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Souki v. Paris Limousine of Oklahoma LLC
as 5:2013cv00423
Plaintiff:
Said Souki
Defendant:
Paris Limousine of Oklahoma LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Wixon v. Hubbard
as 2:2013cv00070
Plaintiff:
Paris Wixon
Defendant:
R. D. Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
U.S. Bank National Association v. Birmingham USPS, LLC et al
as 6:2012mc00007
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Birmingham USPS, LLC, Douglas Customs, LLC, Sierra Vista De, LLC and others
Floyd's 99 Holdings, LLC v. Jude's Barbershop, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02688
Plaintiff:
Floyd's 99 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Jude's Barbershop, Inc. , Jude's Barbershop- Ottawa, Inc. , Jude's Barbershop- Cascade, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Grimes v. Jim Paris Tire City of Montebello Inc
as 1:2011cv00164
Plaintiff:
James Grimes
Defendant:
Jim Paris Tire City of Montebello Inc and Terry Eigenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
