Cases 31 - 40 of 36,697
Nuneviller v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Sara Michelle Nuneviller
Defendant:
State of Utah and Daniel Mears
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hale-El (PS) v. Florres
as 1:2024cv01017
Petitioner:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Respondent:
Ryan Florres, Jaquez and Attorney General for the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Sanders
as 24-2089
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LAZARUS SHAMAR SANDERS
Cordova (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01590
Petitioner:
Louis M. Cordova
Respondent:
Diggins and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larsen et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 4:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Carrie Larsen, Robert Larsen and R. Kent Larsen
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, United States of America, United States Department of Agriculture and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
United States v. Naranjo-Aguilar
as 24-7050
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MARCO ANTONIO NARANJO-AGUILAR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00075
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dorman v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2024cv00948
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Dorman
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Simkins v. Fairbairn, et al
as 24-1140
Plaintiff:
WILLIE J. SIMKINS
Respondent:
MARK FAIRBAIRN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Messick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv01583
Plaintiff:
Randy Messick
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
