Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Edizone v. Merck & Co et al
as 2:2010cv00855
Plaintiff:
Edizone
Defendant:
Merck & Co, Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Brown Shoe Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schwartz v. Ploughe
as 1:2010cv01589
Petitioner:
Robert Schwartz
Respondent:
Pamela Ploughe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McAfee, Sr. v. Plough, et al
as 10-1275
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY A. MCAFEE, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN PLOUGH and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL
Morris v. Ploughe et al
as 1:2010cv01340
Petitioner:
Timothy P. Morris
Respondent:
Pamela Ploughe and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kneen v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv01284
Plaintiff:
Ronald Emmett Kneen
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Herb (I) Spiwak, Herb Spiwak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Ploughe et al
as 1:2010cv01287
Petitioner:
Daniel G. Watson
Respondent:
Pamela Ploughe and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cole v. Organon USA Inc et al
as 5:2010cv00577
Plaintiff:
Hannah Kathryn Cole
Defendant:
Organon USA Inc, Organon Pharmaceutical USA Inc, Organon International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emerson v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01156
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Emerson
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc., Organon Pharmaceutical USA, Inc., Organon International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stallings v. Ploughe et al
as 1:2010cv00600
Petitioner:
Robert E. Stallings
Respondent:
Pam Ploughe and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallin v. Ploughe et al
as 1:2010cv00598
Petitioner:
Oloyea D. Wallin
Respondent:
Pam Ploughe and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
