Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,470
Gentilini v. State of Wyoming et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Defendant: YesCare Operations Supervisor, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden, Cindy Archuletta and others
Plaintiff: David Alan Gentilini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luginbyhl v. Moore, et al
as 24-6102
Defendant: SGT GELISPIE, R. BYRD, Warden, JUDGE PHILLIP C. CORLEY and others
Plaintiff: LEVI LUGINBYHL
Padilla v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00500
Defendant: Warden Wilkens, Alisha Tafoya, Governor of New Mexico and others
Plaintiff: Joseph Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ogden v. Turner, et al
as 24-2079
Respondent: NEIL TURNER, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO and GUADALUPE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner: KEVIN OGDEN
In re: Dunn
as 24-6098
Petitioner: In re: ROBERT DAVID DUNN
Respondent: CARRIE BRIDGES, Warden
Davis v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00486
Petitioner: DeMaurea Davis
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Beach v. Wyoming Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00099
Defendant: Wyoming Governor, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Deputy Administrator and others
Plaintiff: Jesse Beach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gabler v. Fairbairn, et al
as 24-1199
Petitioner: VICTOR GABLER
Respondent: MARC FAIRBAIRN, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Brandt v. Cimarron Correctional Facility and Staff, et al
as 24-6089
Plaintiff: DONNA R. BRANDT
Defendant: CIMARRON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND STAFF, TERRACE DICKERSON, Former Warden, FNU GRANTE, Assistance Warden and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1191
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?