Cases 41 - 50 of 86
Hobbs v. Time Logistics Couriers, LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00746
Plaintiff:
Blake Robert Hobbs
Defendant:
Time Logistics Couriers, LLC and AM Trans Expedite, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mendoza v. Cisneros et al
as 1:2014cv03324
Plaintiff:
Ismael Mendoza
Defendant:
Andrew L. Cisneros, AM Builders & Contractors Supply CO Inc, Fowler & Peth Inc and others
Counter_claimant:
USA
Counter_defendant:
AM Builders & Contractors Supply CO Inc, Andrew L. Cisneros, Ismael Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Werner Enterprises, Inc. v. Rui Zhao et al
as 4:2014cv00729
Plaintiff:
Werner Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Rui Zhao, Grand Express, Corp., Amazon.com, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv01301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Singh v. Pooni et al
as 2:2014mc00236
Plaintiff:
Buta Singh
Defendant:
Harminder S. Pooni, Ravinder Kaur and Pan-Am Transport, Inc
USA v. In Re: AMS Italy .45 Caliber Colt Revolver 50 Rounds of Ammunition
as 1:2014mc00225
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
In Re: AMS Italy .45 Caliber Colt Revolver 50 Rounds of Ammunition
Galow v. Larson et al
as 5:2014cv00985
Plaintiff:
Robert Galow
Defendant:
Steven Larson, Universal Am-Can Ltd and Bulls-Eye Express Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller et al v. McCloud et al
as 1:2014cv01156
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Miller , Terance M. Maher , Max H. Owen and others
Defendant:
Harold S. McCloud , Debra A. McCloud and Thomas J. Power
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Universal Am-Can, Ltd. et al
as 4:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
Universal Am-Can, Ltd. and Thomas Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ames v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00492
Plaintiff:
Katherine Ames
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
