Cases 51 - 60 of 5,539
Ramos, et al v. Garland
as 24-9524
Petitioner:
MODESTA RAMOS RAMOS, A.M.R.R. and J.A.R.R.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Arredondo v. Rios et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Petitioner:
Sergio Arredondo
Respondent:
H. Rios and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simkins v. Fairbairn, et al
as 24-1140
Plaintiff:
WILLIE J. SIMKINS
Respondent:
MARK FAIRBAIRN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Hale-El (PS) v. Florres
as 1:2024cv01017
Petitioner:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Respondent:
Ryan Florres, Jaquez and Attorney General for the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torres v. Attorney General State of New Mexico
as 1:2024cv00347
Petitioner:
Carlos Torres
Respondent:
Attorney General State of New Mexico and R Otero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia Valladares, et al v. Garland
as 24-9523
Petitioner:
NADIA Z. GARCIA VALLADARES and EDIS Z. ESCOTO GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
Luna-Corona v. Garland
as 24-9522
Petitioner:
ADAN ENRIQUE LUNA-CORONA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Thompkins v. Santistevan, et al
as 24-2054
Petitioner:
TERRICK L. THOMPKINS
Respondent:
DWAYNE SANTISTEVAN, Warden and HECTOR H. BALDERAS, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Gonzales v. State of New Mexico et al
as 2:2024cv00336
Petitioner:
Rayner Gonzales
Respondent:
State of New Mexico and Attorney General State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez-Mavarez, et al v. Garland
as 24-9520
Petitioner:
RAFAEL JOSE PEREZ-MAVAREZ and ISABELA SARAY PEREZ-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
