Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Johnson v. McKune et al
as 5:2007cv03299
Plaintiff:
Robert Dean Johnson
Defendant:
David R. McKune and Roger Werholtz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rassel v. Werholtz et al
as 5:2007cv03290
Plaintiff:
Todd A Rassel
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, David R. McKune, Impact Design LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burden v. McKune
as 5:2007cv03287
Petitioner:
Gerry A Burden
Respondent:
David R. McKune
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2007cv03244
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wayne Smith
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Charles E. Simmons, Bill Cummings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhodes v. Raymond et al
as 5:2007cv03228
Plaintiff:
Ronald L Rhodes
Defendant:
Don Raymond, Roger Werholtz, David R. McKune and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Showalter v. McKune et al
as 5:2007cv03205
Petitioner:
Marc Showalter
Respondent:
David R. McKune and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dorsey v. McKune et al
as 5:2007cv03204
Petitioner:
James L Dorsey
Respondent:
David R. McKune and Paul Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. McKune et al
as 5:2007cv03185
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jackson
Defendant:
David R. McKune, State of Kansas, Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Werholtz et al
as 5:2007cv03182
Plaintiff:
Bobby Bruce White
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, (fnu) Knight, L E Bruce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. McKune et al
as 5:2007cv03149
Petitioner:
Kenneth M Cook
Respondent:
David R. McKune and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
