Cases 51 - 60 of 108
Tirri v. Utah Department of Corrections
as 2:2016cv00668
Plaintiff:
Ralph Tirri
Defendant:
Utah Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maughan v. Burnham et al
as 2:2016cv00458
Plaintiff:
Ryan Darley Maughan
Defendant:
Bruce O. Burnham, Utah Department of Corrections, Kathy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Starks et al
as 2:2015cv00754
Plaintiff:
Steven Dale Davis
Defendant:
Donovan Starks and Utah Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snyder v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2015cv00627
Petitioner:
Barry James Snyder
Respondent:
Scott Crowther and State of Utah Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Utah Department of Corrections
as 2:2015cv00269
Plaintiff:
Steven Dale Davis
Defendant:
Utah Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bacilio v. Utah Department of Corrections Board and Parole Members et al
as 2:2015cv00233
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Bacilio
Defendant:
Utah Department of Corrections Board and Parole Members, Curtis L. Garner, Angela Micklos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MacArthur v. Garden et al
as 2:2015cv00117
Plaintiff:
Bret Golden MacArthur
Defendant:
Richard Garden, Kennon Tubbs, Aaron Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maddux v. Utah Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00594
Plaintiff:
Douglas Adam Maddux
Defendant:
Utah Department of Corrections , Scott Crowther , Richard Garden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellsworth Harrell v. Utah Department of Correction and Pardons & Paroles et al
as 2:2014cv00546
Plaintiff:
Ellsworth Harrell
Defendant:
Utah Department of Correction and Pardons & Paroles and Terrie Lockner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
