Cases 71 - 79 of 79
Voss et al v. AMI Mechanical Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00911
Defendant:
St. Andrews Construction Services, Corp., AMI Mechanical Systems, Inc., St. Andrews Electric Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Voss, Cybil Voss and Pinnacol Assurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Evans et al v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2008cv00547
Plaintiff:
Kisha Evans, Kisha Evans, TME and others
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Stephen Boyes, Timothy Pike and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pike v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2008cv01037
Plaintiff:
Jonathan C. Pike and Jonathan C. Pike
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pike v. 9-1-19 Company d/b/a Processing & Recovery Systems
as 1:2008cv00111
Plaintiff:
Richard S Pike
Defendant:
9-1-19 Company d/b/a Processing & Recovery Systems
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pike v. 9-1-19 Company d/b/a Processing & Recovery Systems
as 2:2008cv00112
Plaintiff:
Richard S Pike
Defendant:
9-1-19 Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pike v. 9-1-19 Company d/b/a Processing & Recovery Systems
as 1:2008cv00112
Plaintiff:
Richard S Pike
Defendant:
9-1-19 Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rudolph et al v. Memorial Health System Foundation
as 1:2007cv01036
Plaintiff:
William G. Rudolph and Pikes Peak Center for Colon & Rectal Surgery, P.C.
Defendant:
Memorial Health System Foundation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
