Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 138
NM Off-Hwy Vehicle Alliance v. U.S. Forest Service, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-2135
Petitioner - Appellant: THE NEW MEXICO OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE ALLIANCE, a New Mexico nonprofit corporation
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, THOMAS TIDWELL, in his official capacity as Chief of the United States Forest Service, MARIA T. GARCIA, in her official capacity as Santa Fe National Forest Supervisor and others
Intervenor: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and SIERRA CLUB
Energy & Environment Legal, et al v. Epel, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1216
Plaintiff - Appellant: ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT LEGAL INSTITUTE and ROD LUECK
Defendant - Appellee: JOSHUA EPEL, JAMES TARPEY and PAMELA PATTON, in their official capacities as Commissioners of the Colorado Public Utilities Commission
Defendant Intervenor - Appellee: ENVIRONMENT COLORADO, CONSERVATION COLORADO EDUCATION FUND, CONSERVATION COLORADO EDUCATION FUND and others
Sierra Club, et al v. Bostick, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-6099
Plaintiff - Appellant: SIERRA CLUB, INC., CLEAN ENERGY FUTURE OKLAHOMA and EAST TEXAS SUB REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellee: THOMAS P. BOSTICK, in his official capacity as Commanding General and Chief of Engineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, MICHAEL J. WALSH, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Commanding General for Civil and Emergency Operations, MICHAEL TEAGUE, in his official capacity as Tulsa District Commander of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor - Appellee: TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE LP, TRANSCANADA CORPORATION, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION and others
Powder River Basin Resource, et al v. EPA, et al
as 14-9530
Petitioner: POWDER RIVER BASIN RESOURCE COUNCIL, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION and SIERRA CLUB
Respondent: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and GINA MCCARTHY
Sierra Club v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County, Kansas City et al
as 2:2013cv02447
Plaintiff: Sierra Club
Defendant: Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, Kansas, The and Kansas City Board of Public Utilities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413
Sierra Club v. Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2013cv00356
Plaintiff: Sierra Club
Defendant: Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
Kane County, Utah, et al v. United State We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-4108
Plaintiff - Appellant: KANE COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision
Plaintiff-Intervenor: THE STATE OF UTAH
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae: THE SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY and SIERRA CLUB
Kane County, Utah, et al v. United State
as 13-4110
Plaintiff - Appellee: KANE COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision
Plaintiff-Intervenor - Appellee: THE STATE OF UTAH
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae: THE SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY and SIERRA CLUB
Kane County, Utah, et al v. United State
as 13-4109
Plaintiff: KANE COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision
Plaintiff-Intervenor - Appellant: THE STATE OF UTAH
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae: THE SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY and SIERRA CLUB
Rocky Mountain Wild et al. v. Neil Kornze et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01988
Plaintiff: Grand Canyon Trust , Center for Biological Diversity , Rocky Mountain Wild and others
Defendant: Neil Kornze and U.S. Bureau of Land Management
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?