Cases 1 - 10 of 732
Sandoval et al v. Bosley et al
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Michelle Sandoval, Samuel Herrera, Arthur Martinez and others
Defendant:
John Bosley, Bosley Management, Inc, Santa Clara Apartments and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01377
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Burnham (PS) v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv01397
Petitioner:
Arthur Burnham
Respondent:
State of Colorado and Attorney General for the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Mannie
as 24-6084
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ARTHUR MORRIS MANNIE, JR.
Fidel-Alirez, Jr. et al v. Federal Emergency Management Agency et al.
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Joe Fidel-Alirez, Sam S Arthur and Wyley Cross
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management and Does 1-20, Inclusive
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Chappell v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1100
Petitioner:
ARTHUR JAMES CHAPPELL
Respondent:
STATE OF COLORADO and ADAMS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Walker (PS) v. Lankford et al
as 1:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
Arthur Walker
Defendant:
Lankford, Beeler and Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Convo Communications v. Arthur et al
as 2:2024mc00270
Plaintiff:
Convo Communications
Defendant:
Brandon Arthur
Respondent:
Sorenson Communications
Davidson et al v. Tralo Companies Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00354
Defendant:
ABC Corporation, Tralo Companies Inc, Anthony Bauer and others
Plaintiff:
Josephine Davidson, Geraldine Davidson, Mark Daniel Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
