Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Hunter v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.
as 1:2023cv03048
Plaintiff:
Rena Hunter
Defendant:
Becton, Dickinson and Co., C.R. Bard Inc., Bard Access Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02005
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., DOES 1 through 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garner v. C R Bard,Incorporated et al
as 6:2021cv00138
Plaintiff:
Carrie Garner
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beasley v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv02213
Plaintiff:
Paul Beasley
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. C.R. Bard, Incorporated et al
as 6:2021cv00065
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Verlin Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stanford v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00576
Plaintiff:
Karen Stanford
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Angelo v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00161
Plaintiff:
Mark Angelo
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Claude v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00162
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Virgil Ray Claude
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ortiz v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00516
Plaintiff:
Rosa Ortiz
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burton-Wells et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv02104
Plaintiff:
Steven Wells and Kimberly Burton-Wells
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
