Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hyman v. New Mexico State University et al
as 2:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
Dr. Michael R Hyman
Defendant:
New Mexico State University, The Board of Regents of New Mexico State University, Department Head David Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Vigil v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2021cv00039
Defendant:
No Named Defendants
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Vigil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vigil v. Raemish et al.
as 1:2018cv01499
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Vigil
Defendant:
Rick Raemish, Theordor Lawrence, Denese Asher and others
Interested_party:
THE CASE MANAGER/INMATE COORDINATOR OF: Daniel James Vigil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Driehorst v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2018cv00433
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Driehorst
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Saxton v. Trump et al
as 1:2018cv00476
Petitioner:
Daniel James Saxton
Respondent:
Donald Trump, Jeff Sessions and R. Hudgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Willis v. James et al
as 5:2017cv00819
Plaintiff:
Christopher Willis
Defendant:
Daniel James and Werner Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1128
Debtor - Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03115
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Vigil v. Hartley et al
as 1:2010cv03061
Petitioner:
Daniel James Vigil
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The and Steve Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vigil v. McCellan et al
as 1:2009cv00810
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Vigil
Defendant:
Blake McCellan, Chad Searcy, Mike Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
