Cases 1 - 10 of 392
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1191
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1192
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Duffy v. Wyoming Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, GEO Services Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn P Duffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Runnels v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Savortae Runnels
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Emily Timms, FNU Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tsosie v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Evander Tsosie
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Ruben Quintana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Fawley v. Lea County Correctional Facility, et al
as 24-2037
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN W. FAWLEY
Defendant:
LEA COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, GEO GROUP, INC., R.C. SMITH, former Warden, L.C.C.F. and others
Ezell v. Cole, et al
as 24-6025
Plaintiff:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant:
DAVID COLE, Warden GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU RUSSELL, L/T, Mr., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU COOPER, L/T, Ms., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual capacity and others
Plater v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Raheem La'monze Plater
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Christine Topping and FNU Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonetti v. FNU Santistefan, et al
as 24-2014
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Defendant:
FNU SANTISTEFAN, FNU MARTINEZ, Warden, FNU BROWN, Warden and others
Trotter v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jared M Trotter
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
