Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Garcia v. Bank of America N.A. et al
as 1:2018cv00509
Plaintiff:
Elisa V. Garcia
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , Nationstar Mortgage, LLC , Manuel Lujan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brooks v. Roth et al
as 6:2007cv00350
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Brooks
Defendant:
Miroslav "Mike" Roth, Cibola County Sheriff's Department, Johnny Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Roth et al
as 1:2007cv00350
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Brooks
Defendant:
Miroslav Roth, Cibola County Sheriff's Department, Johnny Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Roth et al
as 2:2007cv00350
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Brooks
Defendant:
Miroslav "Mike" Roth, Cibola County Sheriff's Department, Johnny Valdez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Valdez et al
as 1:2007cv00349
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Brooks
Defendant:
Johnny Valdez, Harold Hall, Manuel Lujan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pfannenstiel v. Hall
as 1:2007cv00245
Plaintiff:
Jay Dee Pfannenstiel
Defendant:
Harold Hall, Mike Cruz, Faron Segota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramah Navajo Chapter v. Lujan, et al
as 1:1990cv00957
Plaintiff:
Ramah Navajo Chapter
Defendant:
Manuel Lujan , Eddie Brown , Marvin Pierce and others
Amicu:
Chugachmiut and Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc.
Movant:
Klamath Tribes, Confederated Tribes of SiletzIndians of Oregon , Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan and others
Claimant:
Confederated Tribes of SiletzIndians of Oregon and Navajo Agricultural Products Industry
Objector:
United South and Eastern Tribes, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Class Counsel
Interpleader:
Alturas Indian Rancheria, Phillip Del Rosa , Darren Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
